Federal grant · formula grant (a)
This Agreement Contains Activities That Complement Existing Environmental Program Grants. Specifically the Recipient Will Use This Multipurpose Funding to Evaluate the Fate of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Microcosms Mimicking Texas Aquifers in Rural Regions. the Intended Beneficiaries Are the Citizens of Rural West Texas Who Are Needing More Reliable Drinking Water and Drinking Water Sources. Groundwater Accounts for ~60 Percent of Water Used in Texas, and Estimates of Future Groundwater Availability Strongly Depend on Groundwater Quality (reedy and Scanlon, 2012. Groundwater Quality in West Texas Is Greatly Impacted by Geologic Sources, and These Waters Are Typically Characterized as Hard, High in Total Dissolved Solids, and Alkaline (PH >8.0). Although Sulfur Is Most Pronounced in Waters Within the Permian Basin, Mineral and Dissolved Sulfur Species Are Ubiquitous Throughout Western Texas and Are Frequently Detected at MM Concentrations, Which Are Atypically
Committed
$25,371
Paid out
$25.3K
100%
Committed, not yet paid
$38
<1%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…