Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
Description: the Fox-wolf Watershed Alliance (FWWA) Will Partner With the Village of Wrightstown and Their Subawardee Outagamie Land Conservation Department (OLCD) ($550,898) in the Plum Creek, to Reduce Nonpoint Source Runoff by Installing Structural Practices That Stabilize Streambanks and Slow the Flow of the Water Across the Landscape. Activities: This Project Will Reduce the Input of Total Suspended Solids by 476 Tons/year, Phosphorus by 619 Lb/year and Stabilize 1.2 Miles of Riparian Corridor in the Fox River, a Glri Priority Watershed. Signs at the Project Site Will Engage Community Members and Build Support to Fund Future Conservation Project. Outcomes: the Village of Wrightstown and the Citizens of the Lower Fox River Watershed Will Benefit From Improved Water Quality Due to Reduced Nutrient and Sediment Runoff. Subrecipient: Outagamie County Will Provide the Design, Siting, and Project Coordination for the Project as Well as Coordinating Construction of Practices. Village of Wrightstown Will Install 2 Agricultural Runoff Treatment Systems With P Filters.
Committed
$599,101
Paid out
$177.2K
30%
Committed, not yet paid
$421.9K
70%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…