Federal grant · cooperative agreement (b)
In Accordance With the Statutory Authority Delegated to Epa Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (rcra), This Cooperative Agreement Will Address U.s. Epa Region 5'S Priority of Preventing Food Loss and Waste and Diverting Wasted Food From Landfills. the Center for Ecotechnology Inc. (CET) Project Will Implement Food Waste Prevention and Diversion Measures in Large Institutional Kitchens (e.g., Hospitals, Universities, Corporate Kitchens, Large K-12 Schools). Their Methods Include: a Swot (strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Analysis of the Regional Wasted Food Marketplace; Training Workshops; Facilitating Partnerships Between Commercial Generators of Food Waste, Haulers, and Service Providers Like Food Rescue Organizations, Compost Sites, and Service Providers; and Remote and Onsite Technical Assistance. Cet Has Decades of Experience Helping Stakeholders and Will Bring That Knowledge and Expertise to Ohio, in Addition to Helping Businesses See Opportunities in T
Committed
$58,964
Paid out
$18.4K
31%
Committed, not yet paid
$40.6K
69%
Everything here is this single award's whole record — signed, amended, paid — not a fiscal-year slice. The by-year charts elsewhere split an award across the years it was committed; this page keeps it whole.
Committed is what the government has legally promised on this award so far. Contracts can also carry a ceiling — the maximum if every option is exercised. Unspent ceiling is headroom, not money owed.
The cash actually disbursed against this award. The gap from committed is the disbursement pipeline: promised, not yet cashed.
Each transaction is a signing event — an action that created or changed the award, dated the day it was signed — not a payment. Negative amounts are real: money de-committed at closeout or renegotiation.
One bar, the award’s whole arithmetic: paid out, then committed, not yet paid, then .
Loading…