Port of Cascade Locks (Formerly: City of… — Receipts Report
Client
Lobbying client · LD-2 disclosures
Port of Cascade Locks (Formerly: City of Cascade Locks)
Oregon
40 filings from 2 registrants · 2008–2019 · latest filed Mar 4, 2019
Reported on its behalf
$435K
every LD-2 on file
Its own filed spend
$0
lobbying for itself
Fees to outside firms
$435K
across every firm on file
Spend over time
Every filing period on record, as reported. One column per filed period — a period with no column is a period with no filing, not a zero.
Basis · Amendments and terminations supersede the original report for the same registrant, client and period, so a revised quarter is counted once at its latest filed value. Registration-only filings carry no activity money and are excluded from these totals.
Who lobbies for them
Every outside firm that has filed on this client's behalf, by fees reported.
This record groups every filed spelling of the client's name into one entity, so "MERCK & CO., INC." and "MERCK & CO INC" read as the same company. The grouping is the client's normalized name — organizations that file under genuinely different names appear separately. Handle: port-of-cascade-locks-formerly-city-of-cascade-locks.
$145K
fees reported
›
Reading this · LD-2 reports a hired firm's fee and a registrant's reported expenses on separate lines and never both on one filing, so the two lists above are different quantities and are ranked separately rather than against each other. Firm names link to their own record as the firms chapter lands.
GAM
14 filings
$220K on those filings
Economics/Economic Development
ECN
9 filings
$90K on those filings
Environment/Superfund
ENV
5 filings
$100K on those filings
Natural Resources
NAT
1 filing
$10K on those filings
Note · A filing names one to several issue areas and reports a single dollar figure for the period, so the same money appears beside every issue that filing declares. The dollar column is therefore spend on filings that named this issue — it is not a split of the total, and these figures sum above it. Filing counts do not double-count.
110th Congress
Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009
5 filingsthrough 2008
S. 1596112th CongressTransportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 20124 filingsthrough 2012
H.R. 2610113th CongressTransportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 20143 filingsthrough 2014
S. 1243113th CongressTransportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 20143 filingsthrough 2014
H.R. 5850111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.2 filingsthrough 2010
S. 3644111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.2 filingsthrough 2010
H.R. 1111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.1 filingthrough 2009
H.R. 1105111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.1 filingthrough 2009
H.R. 146111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.1 filingthrough 2009
S. 22111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.1 filingthrough 2009
How these are found · Bill references are extracted from the free-text activity description each filing writes, then matched to the Congress in session that filing year. A reference we can't match to a bill on file is still shown, unlinked — we cite what the filing said rather than guess at what it meant. Naming a bill is not a position on it: LD-2 records that a client lobbied on the bill, never which side.
Covered position:
8 filingsthrough 2010
Covered positions · 2 of 5 lobbyists named on these filings disclosed a prior government post. The text is reproduced exactly as filed.
