Lobbying client · LD-2 disclosures
Industrial Defender, Inc.
Massachusetts
8 filings from 2 registrants · 2008–2010 · latest filed Apr 15, 2010
Reported on its behalf
$127K
every LD-2 on file
Its own filed spend
$0
lobbying for itself
Fees to outside firms
$127K
across every firm on file
Spend over time
Every filing period on record, as reported. One column per filed period — a period with no column is a period with no filing, not a zero.
Basis · Amendments and terminations supersede the original report for the same registrant, client and period, so a revised quarter is counted once at its latest filed value. Registration-only filings carry no activity money and are excluded from these totals.
Who lobbies for them
Every outside firm that has filed on this client's behalf, by fees reported.
What they lobby on
Issue areas declared on the filings, ranked by how many filings name each one.
Computer Industry
CPI
6 filings
$127K on those filings
Chemicals/Chemical Industry
CHM
2 filings
$50K on those filings
Energy/Nuclear
Bills named in the filings
Every bill reference extracted from the filings' activity descriptions.
- H.R. 2165 111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.2 filingsthrough 2010
- H.R. 2195 111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.2 filingsthrough 2010
- H.R. 2868 111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.2 filingsthrough 2010
- S. 773 111th CongressNamed in the filings; no matching bill record on file.2 filingsthrough 2010
Who did the lobbying
Every lobbyist named on this client's filings.
- Joshua Andrews Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting4 filingsthrough 2009
- Robert Kabel Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting4 filingsthrough 2009
- Kristina Pisanelli Crowell & Moring LLPCovered position: Legislative Assistant, Senator Patrick Leahy3 filingsthrough 2010
- Bryan O'Leary Crowell & Moring LLP2 filingsthrough 2009
- Barry Shapiro Faegre Baker Daniels Consulting
The filings
Every filing on record. Each row links to its full disclosure.
This record groups every filed spelling of the client's name into one entity, so "MERCK & CO., INC." and "MERCK & CO INC" read as the same company. The grouping is the client's normalized name — organizations that file under genuinely different names appear separately. Handle: industrial-defender-inc.
