Lobbying client · LD-2 disclosures
Coalition Against Patent Abuse
District of Columbia
14 filings from 1 registrant · 2019–2022 · latest filed Jan 20, 2023
Reported on its behalf
$440K
every LD-2 on file
Its own filed spend
$0
lobbying for itself
Fees to outside firms
$440K
across every firm on file
Spend over time
Every filing period on record, as reported. One column per filed period — a period with no column is a period with no filing, not a zero.
Basis · Amendments and terminations supersede the original report for the same registrant, client and period, so a revised quarter is counted once at its latest filed value. Registration-only filings carry no activity money and are excluded from these totals.
Who lobbies for them
Every outside firm that has filed on this client's behalf, by fees reported.
Reading this · LD-2 reports a hired firm's fee and a registrant's reported expenses on separate lines and never both on one filing, so the two lists above are different quantities and are ranked separately rather than against each other. Firm names link to their own record as the firms chapter lands.
What they lobby on
Issue areas declared on the filings, ranked by how many filings name each one.
Copyright/Patent/Trademark
CPT
14 filings
$440K on those filings
Health Issues
HCR
14 filings
$440K on those filings
Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace
Who did the lobbying
Every lobbyist named on this client's filings.
- Matthew C Lane Insight Public Affairs, Inc.16 filingsthrough 2022
- Joshua Scott Lamel Insight Public Affairs, Inc.13 filingsthrough 2022
- Sasha Moss Insight Public Affairs, Inc.11 filingsthrough 2021
The filings
Every filing on record. Each row links to its full disclosure.
This record groups every filed spelling of the client's name into one entity, so "MERCK & CO., INC." and "MERCK & CO INC" read as the same company. The grouping is the client's normalized name — organizations that file under genuinely different names appear separately. Handle: coalition-against-patent-abuse.