Lobbying client · LD-2 disclosures
City of Modesto California
California
41 filings from 1 registrant · 2008–2019 · latest filed Apr 19, 2019
Reported on its behalf
$850K
every LD-2 on file
Its own filed spend
$0
lobbying for itself
Fees to outside firms
$850K
across every firm on file
Spend over time
Every filing period on record, as reported. One column per filed period — a period with no column is a period with no filing, not a zero.
Basis · Amendments and terminations supersede the original report for the same registrant, client and period, so a revised quarter is counted once at its latest filed value. Registration-only filings carry no activity money and are excluded from these totals.
Who lobbies for them
Every outside firm that has filed on this client's behalf, by fees reported.
Reading this · LD-2 reports a hired firm's fee and a registrant's reported expenses on separate lines and never both on one filing, so the two lists above are different quantities and are ranked separately rather than against each other. Firm names link to their own record as the firms chapter lands.
What they lobby on
Issue areas declared on the filings, ranked by how many filings name each one.
Government Issues
GOV
32 filings
$850K on those filings
Transportation
TRA
32 filings
$850K on those filings
Urban Development/Municipalities
URB
Bills named in the filings
Every bill reference extracted from the filings' activity descriptions.
Who did the lobbying
Every lobbyist named on this client's filings.
- Elizabeth Moeller Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP33 filingsthrough 2016
- Craig Saperstein Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP25 filingsthrough 2016
- Greg Laughlin Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPCovered position: Former U.S Congressman (TX)20 filingsthrough 2016
- Kristina Pisanelli Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP3 filingsthrough 2008
- Joseph H Lanier Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
The filings
The 20 most recent of 41 filings. Every figure above is built from these records.
This record groups every filed spelling of the client's name into one entity, so "MERCK & CO., INC." and "MERCK & CO INC" read as the same company. The grouping is the client's normalized name — organizations that file under genuinely different names appear separately. Handle: city-of-modesto-california.