Lobbying client · LD-2 disclosures
City of Indian Wells Redevelopment Authority
California
4 filings from 1 registrant · 2010–2011 · latest filed Apr 21, 2011
Reported on its behalf
$40K
every LD-2 on file
Its own filed spend
$0
lobbying for itself
Fees to outside firms
$40K
across every firm on file
Spend over time
Every filing period on record, as reported. One column per filed period — a period with no column is a period with no filing, not a zero.
Basis · Amendments and terminations supersede the original report for the same registrant, client and period, so a revised quarter is counted once at its latest filed value. Registration-only filings carry no activity money and are excluded from these totals.
Who lobbies for them
Every outside firm that has filed on this client's behalf, by fees reported.
Reading this · LD-2 reports a hired firm's fee and a registrant's reported expenses on separate lines and never both on one filing, so the two lists above are different quantities and are ranked separately rather than against each other. Firm names link to their own record as the firms chapter lands.
What they lobby on
Issue areas declared on the filings, ranked by how many filings name each one.
Environment/Superfund
ENV
4 filings
$40K on those filings
Budget/Appropriations
BUD
3 filings
$40K on those filings
Transportation
TRA
Who did the lobbying
Every lobbyist named on this client's filings.
- Gary J Lapaille Mcapitol Management5 filingsthrough 2011
- Lucia G Lebens Mcapitol Management4 filingsthrough 2011
The filings
Every filing on record. Each row links to its full disclosure.
This record groups every filed spelling of the client's name into one entity, so "MERCK & CO., INC." and "MERCK & CO INC" read as the same company. The grouping is the client's normalized name — organizations that file under genuinely different names appear separately. Handle: city-of-indian-wells-redevelopment-authority.